What if "disability" is just sampling different variables?
Documenting the transformation from diagnosis to capability through clinical evidence, theoretical framework, and open-source protocols.
The Core Question
For 37 years, I've had Visual Snow Syndrome, memory inconsistencies, connective tissue issues, and what clinicians call "atypical cognition." Standard medical approach: these are disorders to manage.
Alternative hypothesis: These aren't malfunctions. They're different variable selection processes. What happens when you reverse-engineer yourself to understand the mechanism?
Clinical Evidence
7-year documented myopia improvement (-3.00D → -2.25D) through somatic integration
Published Research
CFF >188Hz (5.4σ above normal), Temporal Parallax Theory, complete protocols
Theoretical Framework
Consciousness as variable selection operating on probability space
The Dual Timeline
Memory inconsistency isn't a bug when you're sampling from multiple temporal streams. This site documents the same events from two perspectives:
Stream 1: Chronological Reality
Objective timestamps. Medical records. Published papers. Verifiable external events.
Stream 2: Understanding Order
When I understood each piece. Coming back to things later. Discovery sequence. Back-and-forth.
The gap between these timelines is the evidence. Temporal parallax in autobiographical memory.
Future: Stream 3 will add 3D/4D visualization showing perspective at each point - what I knew, what I was right/wrong about, the full back-and-forth.
View the TimelinesThe Approach
Document Everything
Clinical records, measurements, timestamps. Not anecdotes - data.
Build Theory
Falsifiable predictions. Testable mechanisms. Published with DOIs.
Open Source Protocols
Complete methods. Anyone can replicate, validate, or break.
Find the Best
Either validate the work or prove it wrong before too many believe it.
From Diagnosis to Capability
Every "disorder" mapped to documented capability:
Published Research
Temporal Parallax Theory
Inter-Ocular Sampling Asymmetry as Basis for Unified Perception
Quantifiable Visual Perception
CFF >188Hz documentation and proprioceptive-ocular integration
The Challenge
This work is either valuable or it's wrong. Either way, it needs people smarter than me to evaluate it properly.
Validate it. Break it. Extend it. Prove me wrong before too many believe me.
Read the Challenge